Kazeem Olalekan
I read with interest the piece by Victoria Bekiempis Comment is free America of the Guardian. The key thrust of the piece is that America is binging on the psychoactive prescription drugs because of its social policy. She said:
There are a couple of potential explanations. To begin, Americans live super high-strung lives, but without significant rewards that could potential justify these stress levels….the proportion of employed people working 50 or more hours weekly has skyrocketed since 1977…the US is one of a handful of countries that doesn’t enforce weekly time off, paid annual leave, or paid maternity leave. A lot of this work is not compensated.
She observed that a lot of this work ‘is not necessarily making people richer’. Her piece cut across why we work. What use is a level of work which sacrifices the joy of living the good life – free from escapist stimulants? Work has an intrinsic good but we must ask ourselves: why we are working? The answer will determine what benefit we gets from it. Like with most things in life, a balance is essential and doing what your body can cope with. Determining one’s level of work in absolute (how much can my body honestly take) not relative (I will do less because my colleague is doing less) terms is important. This, I feel, is essential for psychological welfare.
So there you have it:
The American way of life sounds like it is sick, and drug overuse and abuse might be a symptom of this illness – what happens when existential entrapment and chemical escapism intersect.
- Victoria Bekiempis
This talk of social policy play straight into the hands of those arguing that America is crawling towards the European model. I know there are pluses and minuses of both system and a position where we can pick what is good and ditch what is rubbish can only be a good thing.
I can even map the the attitude to work crudely in the following way:
American model: Demands absolutist attitude towards work, and
European model: Demands the relativist attitude to work.
On the one hand, you want to encourage hard work, but not to an extent that it is detrimental to individual health. On the other hand, you want everyone to do their share of the work to lighten the load.
In reality, there will be those who can do more and those who cannot. The real test lies in the honesty of an individual with regards to how much they can really do. Being honest means you do enough – not too much, not too little! That is sometimes difficult to judge.
A smart system will not reward the work in itself but the honesty that brought it about. That is neither socialism nor capitalism. That is smartism.

